
Arrested for making such a horrible sequel.
When audiences enjoy a film, sometimes they want more, they feel like the character’s journey is not complete. They want to see their favourite characters on the big screen more than once and fall in love with them all over again. Yet when they get their wishes there is always a section of the fans who lambast the producers and film makers for daring to make a sequel and, in some cases, for ruining the first movie as well. So why is it difficult to make a sequel work? Below are some of the reasons I have picked out.
Attempts to be too clever: Ocean’s Twelve is the epitome of awful sequels. The first, Ocean’s Eleven, was brilliant; it brought charm, wit, humour, style and smooth to the screen. It was everything Ocean’s Twelve wasn’t. Twelve tried to run a clever storyline with a twist at the end and it didn’t work at all. It just ended up being a horrible, boring film and the less said about it, the better.

Iron Man 2 tried to run too many storylines with too many new characters.
Trying to do too much: A lot of sequels fall into this category. The first film sets up the characters and completes a story and then, in order to make the sequel better, writers, producers and directors try to cram too much into the next film and it takes away the experience because the storyline runs too thin. This is the case with sequels such as Iron Man 2, in which a lot of work is needed to be done in order to tie in to The Avengers appropriately and so that storyline is thinned out as well as the other storyline involving Whiplash and audiences are left with a boring, lacklustre sequel to a film that promised so much.
No returning cast members: Sometimes, the big wigs at production companies decide that they can make a sequel work even without the stars of the first film. The classic case of this is Grease 2. Grease had charm, loveable characters and great humour and the two leads were perfect: John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John. But the two decided they would not return for a sequel and it was made without them. In a sequel audiences want to see their favourite characters return to the screen, not be introduced to more random people.
Cashing in: It doesn’t take a genius to realise that a lot of sequels, if not all of them, are made to cash in on the commercial success of the original film. This leads to film makers taking good parts of the original film and making it more important in the sequel. An example of this is Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End; everyone loves Captain Jack Sparrow in the first film, but he plays in support to the main story of Will Turner and Elizabeth Swann and his appearances make the film comical. In At World’s End, we are given too much Jack Sparrow to the point of huge annoyance.

The best of Bourne was saved for the third instalment.
The above are just a selection of some of the various reasons sequels do not work and a few examples of bad sequels. This is not to say that all sequels are bad. When done right they can add character development, build up great storylines and become some of the best films ever made. The Bourne Ultimatum, Spider-man 2, The Dark Knight and X2: X-men United are all examples of sequels getting it right.
I sign this. Sequels are rarely as good as the first movie.
It Is True That Sequels Struggle To Be Good In So Many Instances…
…But There Really Are Those Select Few That Go Above AND Beyond The 1ST Films.
My Favorite Examples Are…
“HALLOWEEN II” (The Original Slasher Sequel And The Best Slasher Flick Of The 80s) and “THE EXORCIST III” (A Much Smarter Flick Than The Original).
Very Nifty Post, Fo SHO.
I Really Enjoyed This One.
-BRAD
Thanks for the comment; glad you enjoyed the post.
I haven’t seen either of the sequels you mentioned, not a big fan of horror films here. But yeah, there are the rare occasions when sequels are better, but I think it’s a lot easier to think of BAD sequels rather than GOOD ones.
I Totally Agree, It Is MUCH EASIER To Name Crap Sequels Than It Is To Name The Good Ones.
Good Sequels Are Much Harder To Find These Days.
Like You Said, “Rare Occasions” Indeed Indeed.
You make some great arguments.
Sequels seem to be the bane of so many great films. and it’s a shame too. Sometimes Hollywood cant seem to leave well enough alone. While I liked Iron Man2, it can be argued that it is nothing more than Iron Man 1’s same storyline, only with different characters. And yes, the less said about Ocean’s Twelve, the better.
I am, however, right there with you on your list of great sequels. Including Spider-Man 2!
It is okay to leave some films as “singles,” and I wish Hollywood would get that.
I definitely agree. It seems like rather than leave a film as a stand alone, Hollywood insists on cashing in on it’s popularity, hence the recent releases of The Hangover 2 for example and the continuation of so many franchises.
I really liked the first Iron Man but I thought that the second one didn’t quite match up, even though I still enjoyed it. I felt that it lacked a lot of the charisma of the first film. Although I think that Iron Man 2 is different because of the fact that it had a lot to do in terms of build up, not only for Iron Man 3, but The Avengers as well.
I Was Thinking About This Posting Last Night…
…And Realized I Didn’t Mention To You THE SEQUEL To End All Sequels.
Have You Ever Seen “FRENCH CONNECTION II” ???
The First Film, “THE FRENCH CONNECTION” Won The Oscar For Best Picture AND Best Actor…
…But “FRENCH CONNECTION II” Got A Whole-Lot-Of-NOTHIN’, And Most Folks Never Ever Bothered To See It.
Thing Is…
…It’s BETTER Than The Oscar Winning 1ST Film.
GENE HACKMAN Really Gives The Performance Of His Whole Career In The Second Film.
TRUST ME, If You’re Seeking A Great Sequel…
“FRENCH CONNECTION II” Is THE BEST!
-BRAD
Here Ya Go.
I Did A Quickie Post On “FRENCH CONNECTION II” A Little While Back 🙂
http://youjivinmeturkey.com/2011/11/30/my-favorite-12/
Hope That Helps Ya!
-BRAD
Wow.
In all honesty I wasn’t even aware that a sequel to The French Connection had been made.
I’ll have to try and get my hands on a copy of it somewhere.
Thanks!
No Prob, Bob.
Honestly, “FRENCH CONNECTION II” Got The Shaft HARD. I’d Call It The MOST IGNORED Sequel EVER.
And I Seriously Believe It’s Because Of The Subject Matter. If I Were In A Position To Loan You My Copy, I So SO Would.
I Enjoy Spreading The Love…
…ESPECIALLY In Regard To Flicks I Love That I Think Others MIGHT Love Also, Given The Chance hehehe
Please Keep Up Your Good Work Here.
Your Blog Has Quickly Become One Of My Faves.
There Are A Few Whose Posts I Look Forward To.
Yours IS One Of Those!
Take Care!
-BRAD
Thank you for the kind words; I’m glad you enjoy reading my posts.
I shall try to ensure they remain enjoyable and worth your expectations.
Thanks!
It also bothers me when an actor isn’t in the sequel and they have to get a replacement… like Don Cheadle in Iron Man 2, granted he did a good job, but it just sucks. Especially because EVERYONE pretends like it’s still the same guy and it’s just silly to me.
It’s always annoying when the original actor does not return and rather than introduce a new character they replace them with a different actor.
However, I think in some films they deal with it pretty well and the example you mentioned was dealt with a little when Rhodey (Cheadle) turns up, Stark tells him he looks different and Rhodey’s reply is “It’s me, I’m here, deal with it” or something to that effect and I took that to be a reference to the change of actor.